Acts 18:26

As I have not infrequently treated the rise of the great Alexandrian school as an outcrop from the learning and piety of Apollos, I take this space to record my reasons: 1. Apart from the question in formal shape, I hold that the character and influence of this brilliant Alexandrian must have operated upon Alexandrian converts. 2. But the frequent employment by the Alexandrians of the expressions ( Acts xviii. 24 ) used concerning him by St. Luke, almost textually, confirms my suspicion that they had his high example always before them. 3. The catechetical school was certainly established in Alexandria from apostolic times. By whom more probably than by Apollos? 4. St. Mark’s connection with Alexandria rests on no scriptural evidence, yet it is credited. 5. …

See how the Law was breaking up; see how they were bound by conscience. This, namely, was a Jewish custom, to shear their heads agreeably with a vow. But then there ought to be also a sacrifice ( ch. xxi. 26 ), which was not the case here. “Having yet tarried:” after the beating of Sosthenes. For it was necessary that he should yet tarry, and comfort them concerning these things. “He sailed for Syria.” Why does he desire again to come to Syria? It was there that “the disciples were ordered to be called Christians” ( ch. xi. 26 ): there, that he had been “commended to the grace of God” ( xiv. 26 ): there, that he had effected such things concerning the doctrine. “And with him Priscilla”, lo, a woman also, “and Aquila.” But these he left at Ephesus. With good reason, namely, that they should teach. …

(Recapitulation.) “And they came to Ephesus, and there he left them” ( v. 19 ): for he did not wish to take them about with him, but left them at Ephesus. But they subsequently dwelt at Corinth, and he bears high testimony to them, and writing to the Romans, salutes them. ( Rom. xvi. 3 .) Whence it seems to me that they afterwards went back to Rome, in the time of Nero, as having an attachment for those parts whence they had been expelled in the time of Claudius. “But he himself went into the synagogue.” It seems to me that the faithful still assembled there, for they did not immediately withdraw them. “And when they besought him to stay, he consented not” ( v. 20, 21 ), for he was hastening to Cæsarea. “And having arrived at Cæsarea,” etc., “passing through the region of Galatia and Phrygia, confirming all the disciples.” ( v. …

To the excellence of these St. Luke also bears witness. Partly when he says that Paul “abode with them, for by their occupation they were tent-makers” ( Acts xviii. 3 ); and partly when he points out the woman as receiving Apollos, and instructing him in the way of the Lord. ( ib. 26 .) Now these are great things, but what Paul mentions are greater. And what does he mention? In the first place he calls them “helpers,” to point out that they had been sharers of his very great labors and dangers. Then he says,

[2.] But what means, “according to the flesh?” According to what is in sight; according to the life that now is; according to the discipline of the Gentiles. Then, lest he should seem to be at variance with himself, (for he had convinced both the Proconsul, ( Acts xiii. 12 .) and the Areopagite, ( Acts xvii. 34 .) and Apollos; ( Acts xviii. 26 : through Aquila and Priscilla) and other wise men, too, we have seen coming over to the Gospel;) he said not, No wise man, but, “Not many wise men.” For he did not designedly ( ἀποκεκληρωμένως ) call the ignorant and pass by the wise, but these also he received, yet the others in much larger number. And why? Because the wise man according to the flesh is full of extreme folly; and it is he who especially answers to the term “foolish,” when he will not cast away his corrupt doctrine. …